Register Now

Agenda

Our 2026 agenda is here! See what's in store from the FDA, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Philips, Bausch + Lomb, Takeda, Johnson & Johnson, NAMSA, Baxter, Abbvie and MORE below.

To download a PDF version of the agenda, click here

Please note: Sessions or speakers denoted with * or "tbc" are subject to change.

Please click on the dates below to see each day's program!

MORE THAN AN INTRODUCTION TO EXTRACTABLES AND LEACHABLES
Workshop sponsored by SafeBridge
The workshop offers more than just introductions to the topics, but practical case-studies and examples on how to put together all aspects to develop a compelling submittal to regulatory agencies for acceptance. 

Extractables and Leachables are a complex subject that requires a “team” of analytical chemists, toxicologists and regulatory experts to understand the nature of the drug product, test appropriately, conduct a toxicological risk assessment and interpret the data.

Speakers:
  • Allan W. Ader, Ph.D., DABT, Technical Director, SafeBridge Consultants/Trinity Life Sciences
  • Jamie Zhelesnik, Project Manager, Smithers MDT Limited
End of Workshop
Registration and Light Breakfast Begins
Welcome
ICH Q3E in Practice: From Regulation to Reality
Moderator: Carsten Worsøe, Scientific Director, Novo Nordisk
ICH Q3E Public Consulting and Beyond

This presentation will detail:
  • ICH guideline process
  • Major area of public comments
  • Deep dive into the “threshold project”
Presented by:
  • Lance Molnar, Head of Nonclinical Operations and Risk Assesment, Global Pharmacology and Toxicology, Viatris
  • Daniel Mellon, PhD, Deputy Director, Division of Pharmacology/Toxicology for Neuroscience (acting Director), CDER, FDA
  • Carsten Worsøe, Scientific Director, Novo Nordisk
Leveraging Prior Knowledge: An E&L Risk Based Approach with Scientific & Regulatory Considerations
  • Define prior knowledge and explore its use in Extractable & Leachable strategy with ICH Q3E Step 2b references 
  • Three case studies, linked thematically with prior knowledge, overarching narrative that highlights risk proportionate approach and scientific rationale for patient safety
  • Abbreviated data packages due to prior knowledge

Elizabeth Looney | Senior Principal Scientist, Pfizer
Speaker Q&A

Panelists:
  • Lance Molnar, Head of Nonclinical Operations and Risk Assessment Global Pharmacology and Toxicology, Viatris
  • Daniel Mellon, PhD, Deputy Director, Division of Pharmacology/Toxicology for Neuroscience (acting Director), CDER, FDA
  • Carsten Worsøe, Scientific Director, Novo Nordisk
  • Elizabeth Looney, Senior Principal Scientist, Pfizer
Networking Break
USP Regulatory & Compliance Updates
Moderator: Cheryl LM Stults, Principal, C & M Technical Consulting, LLC
Industry Insights on USP <661.2>: Strategies and Challenges in Physicochemical Testing Compliance for Plastic Packaging
ELSIE conducted an industry survey to assess current practices, challenges, and strategies for physicochemical testing compliance in response to the upcoming USP <661.2> regulations for plastic container closure systems

The survey collected insights from pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, and nutraceutical professionals on testing methodologies, frequency, and the role of these tests in supporting extractable and leachable (E&L) studies and safety assessments for various risk levels

Analysis aims to provide an overview of organizational compliance strategies, identify barriers, and evaluate the use of E&L data as alternatives, ultimately guiding best practices and innovations in plastic packaging qualification.
 
Yemin Liu | Sr. Principal Research Scientist, AbbVie
IPAC-RS Perspectives on Proposed Revisions to USP <1664.1> Leachables in Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products
  • IPAC-RS Response: Comments from the IPAC-RS response to the chapter will be highlighted
  • Regulatory Comparison: How the chapter’s proposed changes compare with current regulatory guidance, such as concepts of Risk Management (ICH Q9) alongside existing FDA regulatory guidance
  • OINDP Dosage Types: Dosage types within OINDP will be highlighted to showcase that a "one-size-fits-all" approach can be problematic
  • Chapter Connectivity: Show the necessary connectivity of the chapter to USP <1663>

James Mullis | Principal Scientist/Program Lead, Thermo Fisher Scientific
PANEL: Leachables Study Expectations for Different Dosage Forms - What and Why?

Panelists:
  • Chris Houston, Research Fellow and Group Leader, Bausch + Lomb 
  • Yemin Liu, Sr. Principal Research Scientist, AbbVie
    • Presentating on behalf of ELSIE
  • James Mullis, Program Lead, Principal Scientist, ThermoFisher Scientific
    • Presenting on behalf of IPAC-RS
Networking lunch
Advances in Analytical E&L Strategies
Moderator: Ewan Pickard, Technical Specialist, Medical Device Testing, Smithers
Adding an extra dimension to E&L – combining ion mobility with LC-MS
  • Confidence in identification of Extractables and Leachables compounds is key to managing toxicological risk to patients. A great way of enhancing assignment confidence is to use high resolution accurate mass MS-MS to help elucidate or confirm molecular structures and formulas
  • However this can be time consuming and less effective for lower abundant species, an alternative for linking together precursor and fragment ions is Ion Mobility Spectrometry (IMS), which is an additional dimension of separation which sits between chromatography and mass spectrometry
  • IMS enables alignment of precursor and fragment ions, particularly in complex matrices, for every ion detected in a chromatogram, although with reduced accuracy versus MS-MS
  • This presentation will compare LC-MS-MS to LC-IMS-MS, as well exploring wider benefits and limitations to using IMS for extractables and leachables studies

Ewan Pickard | Technical Specialist Medical Device Testing, Smithers - Medical Device Testing
Industry Presentation: Effect of ionizing radiation on polymer systems, focusing on the impact of the extractable profile
  • Ionizing radiation is often used for terminal sterilization for medical devices and drug packaging. It can be done by using high energy electron beam, gamma radiation or X-ray
  • As the name indicates this type of sterilization has impact on the materials by generating ions and radicals. Those reactive species are interacting with the polymer matrix itself and the additives
  • Those interactions can initiate or catalyze chemical reactions and generate new chemical species, what needs to be identified and quantified
  • The radiation related chemical changes are often happening over a long period of time, therefore species were identified as extractables can be transforming over time and different chemical profile for leachables can be expected
  • Due to this chemical transformation it is important to perform studies close to the end of the shelf-life of polymeric medical devices and sterilized pharmaceutical packaging or manufacturing parts

Gyorgy Vas | Research Fellow, Intertek Pharmaceutical Services
Use of Computational Methods for the Safety Assessment of E&L Compounds
Bridging the Gap to ICH Q3E: Robust In Silico Framework for E&L Safety Assessments

This presentation will:
  • Provide an overview of the key challenges when assessing the safety of E&Ls and the workflows available to guide assessors
  • Introduce an in silico framework which addresses mutagenicity, local toxicity and systemic toxicity to produce a scientifically robust safety assessment
  • Present a case study which uses this framework to demonstrate the safety of a leachable, and show the value added by using databases, (Q)SARs and read across

Samuel Odebamowo | Senior Application Scientist, Lhasa Limited
Advancing Defensible Read Across and Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) Assessments for Extractables and Leachables

This presentation will:
  • Scientific insights from a data landscape review of ~1,200 E&L substances
  • How Leadscope’s 2026 workflow supports robust analog identification and transparent justification for E&L read across
  • Integration of standardized systemic toxicity data to strengthen decision making
  • Case study highlights showing where the workflow delivers the greatest scientific and operational value, including key steps that support confident progression toward PDE derivation

Candice Johnson, Ph.D. | Senior Research Scientist, Instem
Toxicology
Moderator: Ronald Brown, Toxicologist at Risk Science Consortium, LLC & US FDA (Retired)
Industry Presentation: Challenges in Extractable and Leachables: Case Studies of Sensitive Subpopulations, Large volumes, and Unique Routes of Administration
ICH Q3C, Q3D, and Q3E provide guidelines for calculating permitted daily exposures (PDEs) that are relevant to extractables and leachables, but do not cover every scenario in which a risk assessment for leachables may be required. This presentation will provide case studies of address differences in metabolic capacity, unique sensitivities, and bioavailability variations for different routes of exposure. Scenarios include intrathecal administrations, in utero exposures, and very large volumes. Strategies to address gaps in existing guidance to calculate a robust PDE relevant to the drug product safety will be provided. 
 
Erica Dahl, Ph.D., DABT | Senior Managing Toxicologist, SafeBridge Regulatory & Life Sciences Group
Networking break
Automation of Human Daily Exposure Calculations
  • The results of E&L studies need to be processed to determine potential impact to patient safety, which can be time consuming
  • Processes to collecting, and storing E&L data are crucial for the efficient use of the data
  • A digital tool was created to automate the evaluation of E&L data to expedite patient safety evaluations

Joshua Nelson | Sr. Material Qualification Specialist, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
Application of ISO 10993-17:2023 to Assess Propylene Glycol Exposure from a Medical Device Used in Preterm Neonates: A Case Study
  • Overview of key updates and regulatory expectations under ISO 10993-17:2023 for E&L risk assessment
  • Toxicological considerations for long-term implantable devices used in preterm neonates
  • Case study evaluating a potential leachable from an implantable medical device
  • Practical strategies for regulatorily aligned risk assessment in vulnerable populations

Dr. Erica N. Rogers | Senior Toxicologist II, Gad Consulting Services
Accidental Ingestion as a Reasonably Foreseeable Use Error: A Toxicological Case Study
  • Accidental ingestion represents a reasonably foreseeable hazard associated with the use of certain intraoral medical devices
  • Conducting a toxicological risk assessment grounded in conservative, worst-case exposure scenarios provides a robust and effective strategy for evaluating potential harms 
  • Material-based safety evidence plays a pivotal role in supporting risk acceptability and drives continuous improvements in device design and labeling

Sainath Babu | Senior Regulatory Toxicologist, MED Institute
E&L as a lifecycle problem: integrating risk assessment from design to post-market

Presented by:
Evening Welcome Reception
Registration
Registration
Only for those who did not check in on Day One
Next-Gen Bioprocessing: Navigating Single-Use Materials and USP <665> Compliance
Moderator: Frances Sexton, Bioprocess Chemist, Eli Lilly
Ultrafiltration/Diafiltration (UF/DF) Clearance of Leachables from Mixed-polymer Extracts - Verification by untargeted LC-MS with In-Silico Quantitation
  • Traditional spiking studies often mis-represent UF/DF clearance of organic compounds, need more realistic assessment strategies 
  • Use of mixed polymer plastic extracts -from household items- under intended use conditions to study leachables clearance during UF/DF 
  • Application of untargeted LC HRMS to identify and follow a broad range of leachables through UF/DF processing 
  • Development of an in silico semi quantitation and QSPR based modelling approach to predict clearance behaviour 
  • Insights from clearance data across multiple monoclonal antibodies on the robustness and predictability of UF/DF
Presented by:
  • Ping Wang, TDS Material Sciences, DPDS, Johnson & Johnson
  • Noemi Dorival Garcia, Senior Research Scientist, NIBRT
BioPhorum: Industry alignment on navigating USP <665> & the Evolving E&L Landscape

Presented by:
  • Isabell Sbille, Material Safety Expert, UCB
    • Presenting on behalf of BioPhorum
  • Muneeba Khalid, MS, Ph.D., Principal Process Characterization and Technology Scientist Upstream Investigations, Regeneron
    • Presenting on behalf of BioPhorum
Assessment of Extractables and Leachables Migration from Label Components into Final Drug Product Bags in Cell Therapy
  • In cell therapies, printing inks and labels applied to final drug product bags are becoming emerging sources of extractables and leachables, due to limited packaging barrier properties
  • This presentation explores the potential migration of ink, adhesives, and other label components into extraction solvents using a simulation study of the final drug product bags
  • It also examines whether a new extractable and leachable study is needed when label materials or ink are changed

Ting Cheng | Principal Scientist, Johnson & Johnson
Building a Cumulative Extractables Assessment Using a Validated Database
  • Individual PCM assessments can overlook cumulative effects when trace extractables from multiple components sum to meaningful exposure levels. Our cumulative extractables assessment closes this gap by aggregating data across the full fluid path to evaluate total patient exposure
  • The increasing adoption of single-use-systems adds to the complexity of E&L assessments, which is addressed by an IT solution
  • Our solution to the growing demand is an internally validated GMP system designed with risk based methodology and the ability to generate automated reports

Stephen C. Bady | Principal Scientist in Technical Services / Manufacturing Sciences , Eli Lilly
PANEL: SP 665

Panelists:
  • Desmond G. Hunt, Senior Principal Scientist, USP
  • Elizabeth Looney, Senior Principal Scientist, Pfizer
  • Naga Koduri, Research Scientist II, Baxter
  • Andrey G Sarafanov, Chemist, Acting Team Lead, Principal Investigator, FDA
Networking break
Medical Devices
Advances in regulatory science tools for chemical characterization of medical devices
This presentation describes efforts on adding clarity to ISO 10993 - 18 consensus standard. We will present an overview of the FDA/CDRH regulatory science program in chemical characterization and our approach in identifying critical technical issues and efforts to address them. Some examples of our activities are:
  • Appropriate selection of reference standards is one important area in chemical characterization; the recent Chemical List for Analytical Performance (CLAP) regulatory science tool (RST) describes an approach to help define detectability for nontargeted analysis (NTA) by selecting reference standards based on a priori information on materials.
  • Achieving Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) for volatile extractable analysis from device materials, and standardized sample processing methods to meet AET.

Arghavan V Nawaby | Assistant Director, Chemical Characterization, Center for Device and Radiological Health, FDA (US Food & Drug Administration)
Considerations on how to de-risk unidentified medical device organic extractables from being Cohort-of-Concern Compounds in GC/MS and LC/MS
Nelson Labs has developed a three-phase framework to address concerns that unidentified organic compounds in non-targeted analysis for extractables could be highly toxic Cohort-of-Concern (CoC) substances.
  • Phase 1 involved identifying 12 relevant CoC compound classes based on international standards
  • Phase 2 integrated data for about 90 common CoC compounds into the Nelson Database for direct identification and quantification if encountered
  • Phase 3 expanded the safety net by confirming that over 600 CoC compounds across the 12 classes are present in commercial libraries like NIST/WILEY and can be identified and quantified using mass spectral matching and Relative Response Factor (RRF) data
While not a 100% guarantee, this approach provides a scientific basis for de-risking CoC concerns for unidentified compounds.
 
Dr. Piet Christiaens | Scientific Director, Nelson Labs Europe
Comparing Methods in Non-Targeted Analysis: An Approach to Assessing the GC-MS Detectable Space
Chemical characterization testing per ISO 10993-18 requires comprehensive assessment of extractables and leachables (E&L) from medical devices, yet the lack of standardized analytical methods has resulted in varied approaches and difficulty in understanding the differences in analytical method capability between laboratories. This presentation introduces an approach that quantitatively assesses and compares the GC-MS detectable chemical space between different analytical methods and laboratory configurations as a means of objectively evaluating method capabilities in non-targeted analysis. The proposed approach integrates retention index prediction and response factor prediction, creating a framework that addresses both chromatographic and mass spectrometric detection capabilities.

Presented by:
  • Joshua A. Young, PhD, Chemist, The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Networking lunch
Medical Device Manufacturers Case Studies and Panel: The Trials and Tribulations of Chemical Characterization
Moderator: Sheri Krajewski Senior Global Product Marketing Manager, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices, NAMSA
E&L for Gas Pathway Medical Devices: Practical Insights and Lessons Learned from ISO 18562 Testing
  • Breathing gas pathway devices present distinct E&L challenges due to potential oral and inhalation exposure, various use durations, complex reprocessing methods, and time dependent behavior
  • Worst case risk is typically driven by early time point (T=0) E&L data, while aging studies help demonstrate material stability and low incremental risk over useful life
  • ISO 18562 testing shows VOS emissions generally decline over time, although emission behavior is chemical class dependent and not always first order
  • Key lessons include avoiding over reliance on exhaustive or exaggerated data, inappropriate solvent selection, misalignment with clinical use, and conservative assumptions driven by limited guidance on ISO 18562 4 condensate volume collection
  • A fit for purpose, risk based strategy that integrates ISO 18562 data with toxicological context supports efficient, regulatorily defensible E&L assessments

Denver Faulk | Director of Biocompatibility, Philips
Risk‑Based AET Re‑Evaluation: Improving Efficiency Without Compromising Patient Safety
  • The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) is a tool used by both chemists and toxicologists to set reporting limits for chemical characterizations
  • The calculation of the AET requires accurate inputs, however these inputs can be incorrect due to false assumptions or selection of improper variables, which can lead to retesting
  • Certain compounds, like Cohort of Concern (CoC) compounds, are excluded from AET reporting limits and may receive additional scrutiny by regulatory agencies. This can result in additional evaluation needs and potential re-work
  • This presentation aims to examine ways that the AET can be toxicologically evaluated in an effort to reduce the risk of retesting, while still ensuring a sufficient AET and protecting patient safety

Miki Giffin | Prin. Toxicologist and Biocompatibility SME, Medtronic
When Extraction Sets the Story: Conditioning Parameters as Drivers of Regulatory Review and Toxicological Risk
  • Analytical chemical characterization extraction parameters are defined by ISO 10993 18 and shaped by evolving regulatory agency expectations.
  • These extraction conditions can be aggressive, creating challenges in study design and generating datasets that are difficult to interpret and apply within toxicological risk assessments.
  • This presentation examines real world case studies highlighting the impact of extraction conditions, regulatory feedback received, and how these data ultimately influence toxicological risk conclusions and patients

Steph M. Street | Sr. Prin. Toxicologist, Biocompatibility SME, and Technical Fellow, Medtronic
Evolving Expectations for Toxicological Risk Assessment Under ISO 10993 1:2025
  • How ISO 10993 1:2025 changes expectations for toxicological risk assessment
  • Emerging considerations on TTC concepts for E&L in the ISO/TS 21726 committee draft
  • Case studies: key principles and practical application
  • Strategy development to support global regulatory submissions

Xiaoling (Sharlene) Dai | Sr Principal Toxicologist, Abbott Laboratories
Speaker Roundtable: Perspectives on E&L Experiences With Chemical Characterization
The speakers from this session will discuss:
  • Descriptions of challenges and overcoming challenges with chemical characterization
  • Scientific solutions other manufactures may have used when submitting chemical characterization data, and or toxicological risk assessment
  • The opportunity to ask questions of experts in the medical device industry
Panelists:
  • Denver Faulk, Director of Biocompatibility, Philips
  • Xiaoling (Sharlene) Dai, Sr. Principal Toxicologist, Global Biocompatibility, Abbott
  • Steph Street, Senior Principal Toxicologist and Biocompatibility SME - Technical Fellow - East, Global PRL, Global Technology and Innovation, Medtronic
  • Miki Giffin, Princ. Toxicologist, Toxicology & Biocompatibility - West, Global PRL, Global Technology and Innovation, Medtronic
Closing Remarks